CMW reaction to SBTi analysis
The meta-analysis of carbon credit quality published by the SBTi today is unequivocal: the overwhelming majority of high-quality and peer-reviewed journal articles demonstrate that carbon credits do not represent the climate benefits that they are claimed to represent, and using these to offset emissions inside a company’s value chain could lead to a weakening of global climate action.
Reducing GHG emissions versus using sequestered CO2 to offset emitted GHGs. Reducing spending versus using a credit card to offset purchases.
Resources – Center for Commercial Agriculture
Decision support tools related to farm economics.
Magazines | American Society of Agronomy
Moving away from print will allow us to reduce our carbon footprint and be more sustainable.
A bit of a stretch.
The digital-only format will allow us to publish more timely content: New content will post every week.
We'll tell the story of our members and science using more videos, animations, and illustrations.
See, that makes way more sense.
Projected number of air conditioning units
Better plant more cover crops for GHG offsets. 
Find it interesting that supporters call it “Sleep Training” and opponents call it by the method name: “Cry It Out”. Supporters don’t want to be associated with the negative branding even if it’s exactly what they are doing. There are other forms of sleep training that actually are like training, but “Sleep Training” has somehow become synonymous for leaving a baby to cry for as long as it takes to fall asleep.
No posts